by parol मीनिंग इन हिंदी

उदाहरण वाक्य

1. The thrust of the Statute was that contracts concerning land could not be proved by parol evidence alone.
2. Thus, part performance might be an exception, but it could not, in effect, mean that the underlying contract could be proven by parol evidence.
3. A license is a mere authority; passes no estate or interest whatever; may be made by parol; is revocable at will; and, when revoked, the protection which it gave ceases to exist.
4. Section 54 provides interests in land created by parol and not put in writing and signed have the force and effect of interests at will only except that the lease for 3 years or less at the best rent may be made by parol.
5. Section 54 provides interests in land created by parol and not put in writing and signed have the force and effect of interests at will only except that the lease for 3 years or less at the best rent may be made by parol.
6. We have here an agreement for a lease with nothing in it to shew that goods requiring any particular protection were to be kept on the premises . " Bandy v . Cartwright " 8 Ex . 913 shews that under a demise by parol there is an implied covenant for quiet enjoyment.
7. No evidence to prove the terms maybe given save the document itself ( or, if it is lost, secondary evidence of its contents ), nor may the contents of the document be contradicted, altered, added to or varied by parol or oral evidence, relating to what passed between the parties either before the written instrument was made or during its preparation.
8. This decision was last known to be cited in or by a court of record in 1872, by a litigant in Kraut's Appeal, 71 Pa . 64, ( Pa . 1872 ) who cited it before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for the premise that the right to pass through defendants'house could not be shown by parol ( that is, verbal evidence ).
9. Now this Court has accepted the rule that when a contract has been reduced to writing, the writing is, in general, regarded as the exclusive memorial of the transaction and in a suit between the parties no evidence to prove its terms may be given save the document of secondary evidence of its contents, nor may the contents of such document be contradicted, altered, added to or varied by parol evidence.
10. Now this Court has accepted the rule that when a contract has been reduced to writing, the writing is, in general, regarded as the exclusive memorial of the transaction and in a suit between the parties no evidence to prove its terms may be given save the document or secondary evidence of its contents, nor may the contents of such document be contradicted, altered, added to or varied by parol evidence.